Basketball 2022-23
QuikStatsIowa

Points Scored

1
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

67.1
2
Eddyville-Blakesburg-Fremont

Class 2A - South Central

65.1
3
Sibley-Ocheyedan

Class 2A - Siouxland

64.6
4
Central Lyon

Class 2A - Siouxland

63.1
5
Regina Catholic

Class 2A - River Valley South

61.5

Points Against

1
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

30.9
2
Panorama

Class 2A - West Central

34.9
3
Central Lyon

Class 2A - Siouxland

39.8
4
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

41.1
5
Pocahontas Area

Class 2A - Twin Lakes

41.2

Point Difference

1
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

36.1
2
Central Lyon

Class 2A - Siouxland

23.3
3
Eddyville-Blakesburg-Fremont

Class 2A - South Central

22.4
4
Sibley-Ocheyedan

Class 2A - Siouxland

22.0
5
Panorama

Class 2A - West Central

19.1

Points Per Game

1
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

67.1
2
Eddyville-Blakesburg-Fremont

Class 2A - South Central

65.1
3
Sibley-Ocheyedan

Class 2A - Siouxland

64.6
4
Central Lyon

Class 2A - Siouxland

63.1
5
Regina Catholic

Class 2A - River Valley South

61.5

Assists Per Game

1
Sibley-Ocheyedan

Class 2A - Siouxland

17.5
2
Eddyville-Blakesburg-Fremont

Class 2A - South Central

17.2
3
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

16.7
4
Regina Catholic

Class 2A - River Valley South

16.1
5
Central Lyon

Class 2A - Siouxland

15.3

Rebounds Per Game

1
Panorama

Class 2A - West Central

37.6
2
Pocahontas Area

Class 2A - Twin Lakes

36.9
3
Eddyville-Blakesburg-Fremont

Class 2A - South Central

36.6
4
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

34.7
5
Sibley-Ocheyedan

Class 2A - Siouxland

34.6

Steals Per Game

1
Pocahontas Area

Class 2A - Twin Lakes

17.8
2
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

16.5
3
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

15.9
4
Panorama

Class 2A - West Central

15.1
5
Sibley-Ocheyedan

Class 2A - Siouxland

13.1

Blocks Per Game

1
Eddyville-Blakesburg-Fremont

Class 2A - South Central

7.4
2
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

6.0
3
Pocahontas Area

Class 2A - Twin Lakes

5.3
4
Central Lyon

Class 2A - Siouxland

4.4
5
Panorama

Class 2A - West Central

4.0

Field Goals Made Per Game

1
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

26.4
2
Eddyville-Blakesburg-Fremont

Class 2A - South Central

25.2
3
Sibley-Ocheyedan

Class 2A - Siouxland

24.2
4
Central Lyon

Class 2A - Siouxland

24.0
5
Regina Catholic

Class 2A - River Valley South

24.0

Field Goal Attempts Per Game

1
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

58.7
2
Pocahontas Area

Class 2A - Twin Lakes

57.1
3
Panorama

Class 2A - West Central

56.9
4
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

56.0
5
Sibley-Ocheyedan

Class 2A - Siouxland

54.6

Field Goal Percentage

1
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

47.2%
2
Pocahontas Area

Class 2A - Twin Lakes

37.4%
3
Panorama

Class 2A - West Central

36.1%
4
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

35.4%
5
Central Lyon

Class 2A - Siouxland

47.2%

Three Pointers Made Per Game

1
Regina Catholic

Class 2A - River Valley South

7.2
2
Central Lyon

Class 2A - Siouxland

7.0
2
Pocahontas Area

Class 2A - Twin Lakes

7.0
4
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

6.0
5
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

5.5

Three Point Attempts Per Game

1
Pocahontas Area

Class 2A - Twin Lakes

23.9
2
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

22.1
3
Regina Catholic

Class 2A - River Valley South

21.1
4
Central Lyon

Class 2A - Siouxland

17.5
5
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

16.8

Three Point Percentage

1
Regina Catholic

Class 2A - River Valley South

34.1%
2
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

32.6%
3
Pocahontas Area

Class 2A - Twin Lakes

29.3%
4
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

27.0%
5
Central Lyon

Class 2A - Siouxland

40.0%

Free Throws Made Per Game

1
Sibley-Ocheyedan

Class 2A - Siouxland

12.2
2
Eddyville-Blakesburg-Fremont

Class 2A - South Central

9.4
3
Panorama

Class 2A - West Central

8.7
4
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

8.7
5
Pocahontas Area

Class 2A - Twin Lakes

8.5

Free Throw Attempts Per Game

1
Sibley-Ocheyedan

Class 2A - Siouxland

16.2
2
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

15.8
3
Eddyville-Blakesburg-Fremont

Class 2A - South Central

15.2
4
Pocahontas Area

Class 2A - Twin Lakes

15.1
5
Panorama

Class 2A - West Central

14.4

Free Throw Percentage

1
Sibley-Ocheyedan

Class 2A - Siouxland

75.1%
2
Eddyville-Blakesburg-Fremont

Class 2A - South Central

61.4%
3
Pocahontas Area

Class 2A - Twin Lakes

56.6%
4
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

55.2%
5
Regina Catholic

Class 2A - River Valley South

60.9%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

52.1%
2
Pocahontas Area

Class 2A - Twin Lakes

43.5%
3
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

40.5%
4
Panorama

Class 2A - West Central

39.8%
5
Central Lyon

Class 2A - Siouxland

54.1%

Offensive Rebounds Per Game

1
Pocahontas Area

Class 2A - Twin Lakes

16.6
2
Panorama

Class 2A - West Central

15.5
3
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

15.5
4
Eddyville-Blakesburg-Fremont

Class 2A - South Central

13.4
5
Central Lyon

Class 2A - Siouxland

12.6

Defensive Rebounds Per Game

1
Sibley-Ocheyedan

Class 2A - Siouxland

23.4
2
Eddyville-Blakesburg-Fremont

Class 2A - South Central

23.2
3
Panorama

Class 2A - West Central

22.1
4
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central

21.5
5
Central Lyon

Class 2A - Siouxland

21.5
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND