Basketball 2022-23
QuikStatsIowa
Show Filters

Points Scored

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 64.9
2
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 62.3
3
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 61.9
4
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 55.3
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 54.4

Points Against

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 44.0
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 46.2
3
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 49.7
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 49.8
5
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 55.7

Point Difference

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 17.9
2
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 12.6
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 9.2
4
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 9.1
5
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 3.2

Points Per Game

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 62.9
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 61.9
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 57.2
4
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 55.3
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 54.4

Assists Per Game

1
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 15.8
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 15.5
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 14.0
4
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 13.2
5
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 12.9

Rebounds Per Game

1
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 31.9
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 31.3
3
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 29.2
4
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 27.3
5
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 26.2

Steals Per Game

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 13.0
2
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 10.9
3
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 10.1
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 8.8
5
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 7.7

Blocks Per Game

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 4.3
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 3.5
3
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 3.3
4
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 3.0
5
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 2.1

Field Goals Made Per Game

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 24.8
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 23.5
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 23.1
4
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 22.7
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 20.2

Field Goal Attempts Per Game

1
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 51.8
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 50.9
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 50.4
4
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 49.0
5
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 48.7

Field Goal Percentage

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 49.3%
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 46.3%
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 44.5%
4
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 40.9%
5
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 46.5%

Three Pointers Made Per Game

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 8.0
2
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 6.3
3
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 5.2
4
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 5.1
5
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 4.9

Three Point Attempts Per Game

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 22.9
2
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 20.7
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 19.5
4
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 17.7
5
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 16.0

Three Point Percentage

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 34.8%
2
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 30.5%
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 30.3%
4
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 25.1%
5
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 32.8%

Free Throws Made Per Game

1
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 10.0
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 8.8
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 8.5
4
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 6.8
5
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 6.6

Free Throw Attempts Per Game

1
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 16.4
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 12.7
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 11.8
4
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 11.6
5
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 11.1

Free Throw Percentage

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 72.5%
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 68.9%
3
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 61.2%
4
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 59.0%
5
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 66.4%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 54.1%
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 53.9%
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 48.8%
4
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 47.3%
5
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 51.9%

Offensive Rebounds Per Game

1
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 12.7
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 9.6
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 8.9
4
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 8.3
5
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 7.5

Defensive Rebounds Per Game

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 21.7
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 20.9
3
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 19.8
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 19.5
5
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 19.2
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND