Basketball 2022-23
QuikStatsIowa
Stats
Rk Athlete Event
FGM
FGA
FGPCT
3PM
3PA
3PPCT
eFGPCT
FTM
FTA
FTPCT
1
Preston Gillespie, SR F, #23

Dunkerton

vs.
14 21 66.7% 0 1 0.0% 66.7% 13 17 76.5%
2
Ty Purdy, SR #25

Don Bosco

vs.
12 28 42.9% 2 6 33.3% 46.4% 11 13 84.6%
2
Trenten Swenson, SR G, #12

Riceville

vs.
6 19 31.6% 1 8 12.5% 34.2% 11 13 84.6%
4
Casey Gardner, SR G, #24

Dunkerton

vs.
Baxter 81-67

Fri Jan 6

9 19 47.4% 3 8 37.5% 55.3% 10 12 83.3%
4
Johnny Adams, SO G, #10

Riceville

vs.
9 14 64.3% 4 6 66.7% 78.6% 10 12 83.3%
6
Oakley Semelroth, SR F, #52

Tripoli

vs.
13 19 68.4% 1 2 50.0% 71.1% 9 12 75.0%
7
Aaron Zwack, SR G, #5

Waterloo Christian

9 20 45.0% 0 6 0.0% 45.0% 8 11 72.7%
7
Drew Wagner, JR F, #52

Waterloo Christian

10 19 52.6% 0 1 0.0% 52.6% 8 10 80.0%
9
Rogan Gergen, SR #11

Janesville

vs.
4 7 57.1% 0 3 0.0% 57.1% 7 11 63.6%
9
Talan Pletz, FR #5

Janesville

7 11 63.6% 0 0 0.0% 63.6% 7 8 87.5%
9
Eli Schmidt, JR G, #0

Clarksville

vs.
Rockford 63-49

Mon Nov 28

9 16 56.2% 1 3 33.3% 59.4% 7 12 58.3%
9
Jacob Stauffer, SR F, #24

Clarksville

vs.
6 11 54.5% 0 2 0.0% 54.5% 7 10 70.0%
9
Aidan Ebert, SO G, #5

Riceville

vs.
1 7 14.3% 0 2 0.0% 14.3% 7 10 70.0%
14
Dylan Marquart, SO G, #3

Dunkerton

vs.
4 16 25.0% 4 15 26.7% 37.5% 6 9 66.7%
14
Keegan Eastman, SR #10

Janesville

vs.
AGWSR 48-36

Thu Jan 5

6 19 31.6% 3 10 30.0% 39.5% 6 9 66.7%
14
Ben Belew, SO #3

Don Bosco

vs.
4 11 36.4% 0 2 0.0% 36.4% 6 10 60.0%
17
vs.
4 9 44.4% 2 5 40.0% 55.6% 5 6 83.3%
17
Zach Belew, SO #41

Don Bosco

vs.
7 11 63.6% 1 1 100.0% 68.2% 5 7 71.4%
17
Ryder Fair, JR G/F, #15

Riceville

vs.
1 5 20.0% 0 1 0.0% 20.0% 5 6 83.3%
17
Kaden Kobliska, JR G, #4

Riceville

2 5 40.0% 0 0 0.0% 40.0% 5 9 55.6%
21
Braiden VanLengen, SR F, #1

Dunkerton

vs.
4 6 66.7% 0 0 0.0% 66.7% 4 6 66.7%
21
Mason Michels, SO G, #2

Dunkerton

vs.
0 1 0.0% 0 1 0.0% 0.0% 4 4 100.0%
21
Rowan Carlson, SR G, #0

Tripoli

vs.
Baxter 40-57

Sat Dec 10

3 10 30.0% 0 2 0.0% 30.0% 4 4 100.0%
21
DeShaun Wilder, SR G/F, #20

Tripoli

7 16 43.8% 1 3 33.3% 46.9% 4 8 50.0%
21
Sam Hoodjer, SO G, #14

Clarksville

vs.
3 6 50.0% 1 2 50.0% 58.3% 4 6 66.7%
21
David Schmitz, SO #31

Don Bosco

vs.
0 7 0.0% 0 7 0.0% 0.0% 4 8 50.0%
21
Eli Evans, FR F, #23

Waterloo Christian

vs.
11 14 78.6% 3 6 50.0% 89.3% 4 6 66.7%
28
Jayden Downs, SR G, #33

Dunkerton

vs.
3 5 60.0% 0 0 0.0% 60.0% 3 3 100.0%
28
Noah Fuelling, SO G, #5

Dunkerton

vs.
1 3 33.3% 0 2 0.0% 33.3% 3 5 60.0%
28
Tyce Miller, SR G, #10

Tripoli

vs.
3 8 37.5% 1 2 50.0% 43.8% 3 5 60.0%
28
Bryce Schroeder, SR F, #23

Tripoli

vs.
2 4 50.0% 0 1 0.0% 50.0% 3 5 60.0%
28
Gabe Meaney, SO #21

Janesville

3 6 50.0% 0 0 0.0% 50.0% 3 4 75.0%
28
Alex Belew, FR #13

Don Bosco

vs.
1 1 100.0% 0 0 0.0% 100.0% 3 4 75.0%
28
Landon Frost, JR #23

Don Bosco

vs.
4 4 100.0% 0 0 0.0% 100.0% 3 6 50.0%
28
Jared Aronson, JR G, #10

Waterloo Christian

vs.
1 3 33.3% 1 1 100.0% 50.0% 3 4 75.0%
28
Jack Adams, SO F, #1

Riceville

vs.
BCLUW 55-66

Fri Feb 3

2 4 50.0% 0 0 0.0% 50.0% 3 3 100.0%
37
Jacob Snyder, JR F, #42

Dunkerton

vs.
1 4 25.0% 0 0 0.0% 25.0% 2 4 50.0%
37
Dalton Weepie, SO F, #32

Dunkerton

vs.
3 3 100.0% 0 0 0.0% 100.0% 2 2 100.0%
37
Aidan Hesse, FR F, #20

Dunkerton

vs.
2 2 100.0% 0 0 0.0% 100.0% 2 3 66.7%
37
Colin Snyder, FR G, #4

Dunkerton

0 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 2 2 100.0%
37
Daniel Comer, SR G, #1

Tripoli

vs.
1 1 100.0% 0 0 0.0% 100.0% 2 2 100.0%
37
Dane Appleby, SO #4

Janesville

vs.
0 3 0.0% 0 2 0.0% 0.0% 2 4 50.0%
37
Isaac Jones, FR #2

Janesville

vs.
Hudson 41-65

Mon Nov 28

0 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 2 2 100.0%
37
Peyton Trees, SR #1

Janesville

vs.
0 1 0.0% 0 1 0.0% 0.0% 2 2 100.0%
37
Joe Kiene, JR #22

Janesville

1 4 25.0% 0 0 0.0% 25.0% 2 2 100.0%
37
Connor Tesone, SR G, #12

Clarksville

vs.
3 5 60.0% 0 0 0.0% 60.0% 2 3 66.7%
37
Levi Kampman, SR F, #20

Clarksville

vs.
2 7 28.6% 2 6 33.3% 42.9% 2 4 50.0%
37
Avery McEnany, JR G, #30

Clarksville

2 3 66.7% 0 0 0.0% 66.7% 2 2 100.0%
37
John Stauffer, SO F, #32

Clarksville

vs.
0 1 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 2 2 100.0%
37
Cael Kuecker, FR #51

Don Bosco

vs.
0 2 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 2 2 100.0%
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND