Basketball 2013-14
QuikStatsIowa
Show Filters

Points Scored

1
Van Buren County

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 107
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 93
3
Maharishi

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 89
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 88
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 84

Points Against

1
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 12
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 19
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 21
4
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 23
5
Van Buren County

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 24

Point Difference

1
Van Buren County

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 82
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 70
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 65
4
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 52
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 48

Points

1
Van Buren County

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 107
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 93
3
Maharishi

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 89
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 88
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 84

Assists

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 26
2
Van Buren County

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 25
3
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 23
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 22
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 21

Rebounds

1
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 51
2
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 47
2
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 47
2
Van Buren County

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 47
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 44

Steals

1
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 24
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 22
3
Maharishi

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 19
4
Van Buren County

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 18
5
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 17

Blocks

1
Van Buren County

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 13
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 9
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 9
4
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 8
4
Harmony, Farmington

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 8

Field Goals Made

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 39
2
Van Buren County

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 38
3
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 36
3
Maharishi

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 36
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 35

Field Goal Attempts

1
Maharishi

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 78
1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 78
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 74
4
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 69
5
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 67

Field Goal Percentage

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 67.3%
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 58.2%
3
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 54.9%
4
Maharishi

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 51.9%
5
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 47.2%

Three Pointers Made

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 15
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 12
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 11
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 11
5
Van Buren County

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 10

Three Point Attempts

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 35
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 31
2
Harmony, Farmington

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 31
4
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 29
5
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 25

Three Point Percentage

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 55.6%
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 52.6%
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 50.0%
4
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 43.8%
5
Harmony, Farmington

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 33.3%

Free Throws Made

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 32
2
Van Buren County

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 30
3
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 28
4
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 27
5
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 25

Free Throw Attempts

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 41
2
Van Buren County

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 40
3
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 39
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 38
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 36

Free Throw Percentage

1
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 100.0%
1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 100.0%
3
Van Buren County

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 88.5%
4
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 83.3%
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 73.7%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 76.9%
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 64.7%
3
Maharishi

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 61.1%
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 60.0%
5
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 53.1%

Offensive Rebounds

1
Van Buren County

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 23
1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 23
3
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 21
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 21
3
Harmony, Farmington

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 21

Defensive Rebounds

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 31
1
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 31
3
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 30
3
Maharishi

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 30
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 30
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND