Basketball 2013-14
QuikStatsIowa
Stats
Rk Athlete Event
FGM
FGA
FGPCT
3PM
3PA
3PPCT
eFGPCT
FTM
FTA
FTPCT
1
Dylan Menke, SR #10

Holy Trinity Catholic

vs.
10 17 58.8% 9 13 69.2% 85.3% 4 10 40.0%
1
Mason Speer, JR #4

Danville

12 20 60.0% 9 13 69.2% 82.5% 3 4 75.0%
3
Sam Harmeyer, SR #32

Holy Trinity Catholic

vs.
9 12 75.0% 8 10 80.0% 108.3% 1 1 100.0%
4 7 12 58.3% 7 10 70.0% 87.5% 1 3 33.3%
5
vs.
7 11 63.6% 6 8 75.0% 90.9% 0 0 0.0%
5
vs.
9 11 81.8% 6 6 100.0% 109.1% 0 0 0.0%
5
Cody Moehn, SR G, #4

Burlington Notre Dame

6 11 54.5% 6 11 54.5% 81.8% 2 2 100.0%
8
Reed Shockley, SR #4

Central Lee

vs.
9 22 40.9% 5 11 45.5% 52.3% 1 1 100.0%
8
Cody Streeby, JR G, #12

Cardinal

vs.
Danville 48-80

Fri Jan 10

8 12 66.7% 5 5 100.0% 87.5% 2 3 66.7%
8
Mitch Boles, JR G, #12

New London

vs.
Cardinal 63-62

Sat Jan 18

5 11 45.5% 5 9 55.6% 68.2% 4 4 100.0%
8
Xavior Williams, SO G, #23

Burlington Notre Dame

vs.
11 20 55.0% 5 8 62.5% 67.5% 6 10 60.0%
8
Brandon Plecker, JR G, #3

Van Buren County

8 10 80.0% 5 6 83.3% 105.0% 0 0 0.0%
8
Garrett Saunders, JR G, #32

Van Buren County

vs.
6 8 75.0% 5 5 100.0% 106.2% 3 4 75.0%
14
Ryan Koenig, SR #24

Holy Trinity Catholic

6 11 54.5% 4 6 66.7% 72.7% 0 0 0.0%
14
Luis Galle, SR #14

Central Lee

vs.
6 11 54.5% 4 7 57.1% 72.7% 0 2 0.0%
14
Charlie Rachford, SR G, #22

Cardinal

vs.
8 19 42.1% 4 7 57.1% 52.6% 1 5 20.0%
14 6 8 75.0% 4 5 80.0% 100.0% 2 3 66.7%
14
Stephen Townsend, JR F, #22

Harmony, Farmington

vs.
Moravia 63-64

Sat Jan 4

4 11 36.4% 4 8 50.0% 54.5% 2 2 100.0%
14
Logan Hoschek, JR G, #30

Burlington Notre Dame

6 7 85.7% 4 5 80.0% 114.3% 0 0 0.0%
14
Will Mertens, SO F, #21

Van Buren County

vs.
Danville 79-78

Tue Jan 21

6 8 75.0% 4 5 80.0% 100.0% 0 1 0.0%
14
Kyle Rokosz, SR #30

West Burlington

6 10 60.0% 4 7 57.1% 80.0% 0 0 0.0%
22
Tanner Kelch, JR #34

Holy Trinity Catholic

5 8 62.5% 3 4 75.0% 81.2% 0 2 0.0%
22
Kyler Hugg, SR #2

Central Lee

3 7 42.9% 3 6 50.0% 64.3% 5 6 83.3%
22
Winston Wallingford, JR F, #02

Harmony, Farmington

vs.
5 13 38.5% 3 5 60.0% 50.0% 1 4 25.0%
22
Bryan Dye, JR G, #10

Harmony, Farmington

vs.
3 18 16.7% 3 16 18.8% 25.0% 2 2 100.0%
22
vs.
Danville 33-86

Thu Jan 16

6 8 75.0% 3 4 75.0% 93.8% 0 0 0.0%
22
Hunter Moeller, JR G, #4

New London

4 7 57.1% 3 6 50.0% 78.6% 0 0 0.0%
22
Quincy Porter, JR F, #23

New London

vs.
Cardinal 49-73

Fri Jan 24

5 8 62.5% 3 4 75.0% 81.2% 0 2 0.0%
22
Tyler Stevenson, FR G, #10

New London

5 6 83.3% 3 4 75.0% 108.3% 1 3 33.3%
22
Jeff Giannettino, JR F, #12

Burlington Notre Dame

vs.
4 14 28.6% 3 8 37.5% 39.3% 2 2 100.0%
22
David Earhart, JR F, #40

Burlington Notre Dame

vs.
3 4 75.0% 3 3 100.0% 112.5% 2 2 100.0%
22
Austin Bartholomew, SO G, #23

Van Buren County

3 5 60.0% 3 5 60.0% 90.0% 0 0 0.0%
22
Niko Selmon, JR #14

West Burlington

4 9 44.4% 3 6 50.0% 61.1% 1 3 33.3%
34
Blake Hellweg, JR #12

Holy Trinity Catholic

vs.
7 17 41.2% 2 5 40.0% 47.1% 8 10 80.0%
34
Tyler Delaney, JR #4

Holy Trinity Catholic

2 7 28.6% 2 6 33.3% 42.9% 2 2 100.0%
34
Connor Conrad, FR #2

Holy Trinity Catholic

vs.
3 6 50.0% 2 3 66.7% 66.7% 0 0 0.0%
34
Nick Hopper, JR #14

Holy Trinity Catholic

vs.
Cardinal 67-19

Mon Jan 20

3 4 75.0% 2 2 100.0% 100.0% 0 0 0.0%
34
Tyler Bryant, JR #12

Central Lee

vs.
5 12 41.7% 2 3 66.7% 50.0% 2 4 50.0%
34
Jeremy Marshall, SR #3

Central Lee

vs.
2 5 40.0% 2 4 50.0% 60.0% 2 2 100.0%
34
Blake Burgess, FR #40

Central Lee

2 5 40.0% 2 5 40.0% 60.0% 0 0 0.0%
34
vs.
0 2 0.0% 2 6 33.3% 150.0% 0 0 0.0%
34 3 3 100.0% 2 2 100.0% 133.3% 0 0 0.0%
34
vs.
5 11 45.5% 2 3 66.7% 54.5% 0 0 0.0%
34 3 6 50.0% 2 4 50.0% 66.7% 0 0 0.0%
34
Tristan Kadel, JR F, #21

New London

3 7 42.9% 2 2 100.0% 57.1% 2 2 100.0%
34
Jayden Flowers, SO G, #2

New London

2 3 66.7% 2 2 100.0% 100.0% 0 0 0.0%
34
Jay Meekins, JR G, #22

Burlington Notre Dame

4 5 80.0% 2 3 66.7% 100.0% 0 0 0.0%
34
Spencer Ferguson, SO G, #32

Burlington Notre Dame

vs.
3 4 75.0% 2 3 66.7% 100.0% 1 2 50.0%
34
Brayden Starnes, JR G, #15

Van Buren County

vs.
2 3 66.7% 2 3 66.7% 100.0% 0 0 0.0%
34
Drew Nolting, SR G, #24

Van Buren County

2 3 66.7% 2 2 100.0% 100.0% 0 0 0.0%
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND