Basketball 2011-12
QuikStatsIowa

Points

1
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

88
2
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

78
3
North Linn

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

77
4
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

76
5
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

75

Assists

1
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

25
2
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

24
3
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

23
3
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

23
5
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

21

Rebounds

1
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

47
2
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

44
2
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

44
4
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

40
4
Starmont

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

40

Steals

1
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

22
2
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

21
3
North Linn

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

17
3
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

17
5
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

14

Blocks

1
Starmont

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

10
1
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

10
3
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

9
4
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

8
4
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

8

Field Goals Made

1
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

34
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

32
2
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

32
4
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

31
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

30

Field Goal Attempts

1
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

72
2
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

69
3
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

66
4
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

64
4
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

64

Field Goal Percentage

1
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

62.5%
2
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

59.6%
3
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

52.4%
4
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

48.9%
5
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

48.3%

Three Pointers Made

1
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

12
2
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

11
2
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

11
4
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

10
5
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

9

Three Point Attempts

1
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

30
2
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

28
3
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

27
4
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

26
4
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

26

Three Point Percentage

1
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

63.2%
2
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

62.5%
3
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

60.0%
4
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

50.0%
5
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

41.7%

Free Throws Made

1
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

22
2
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

19
2
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

19
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

17
4
North Linn

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

17

Free Throw Attempts

1
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

36
2
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

29
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

28
4
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

27
5
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

26

Free Throw Percentage

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

100.0%
1
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

100.0%
3
North Linn

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

91.7%
4
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

85.7%
5
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

81.2%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

67.7%
2
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

62.3%
3
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

61.9%
4
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

58.1%
5
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

56.9%

Offensive Rebounds

1
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

22
2
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

21
3
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

19
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

18
4
Starmont

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

18

Defensive Rebounds

1
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

33
2
Starmont

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

31
3
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

30
4
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

28
4
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

28
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND