Basketball 2008-09
QuikStatsIowa
Show Filters

Points Scored

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 57.2
2
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 53.4
3
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 50.0
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 48.0
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 46.4

Points Against

1
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 32.9
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 38.2
3
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 42.7
4
North Linn

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 42.8
5
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 43.5

Point Difference

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 14.5
2
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 12.2
3
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 9.9
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 9.8
5
North Linn

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 3.1

Points Per Game

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 57.2
2
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 53.5
3
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 50.0
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 48.0
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 46.4

Assists Per Game

1
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 13.2
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 12.9
3
North Linn

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 11.6
4
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 11.0
5
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 10.3

Rebounds Per Game

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 33.8
2
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 30.4
3
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 28.6
4
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 28.6
5
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 23.8

Steals Per Game

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 10.1
2
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 9.9
3
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 9.2
4
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 8.1
4
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 8.1

Blocks Per Game

1
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 3.4
2
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 2.0
3
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 2.0
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 2.0
5
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 2.0

Field Goals Made Per Game

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 21.5
2
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 19.0
3
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 18.8
4
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 17.7
5
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 16.7

Field Goal Attempts Per Game

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 50.8
2
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 46.3
3
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 45.9
4
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 45.0
5
North Linn

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 43.8

Field Goal Percentage

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 42.3%
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 41.0%
3
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 40.7%
4
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 38.1%
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 37.2%

Three Pointers Made Per Game

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 5.6
2
North Linn

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 4.7
3
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 4.5
4
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 4.4
5
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 3.4

Three Point Attempts Per Game

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 18.2
2
North Linn

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 15.6
3
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 14.9
4
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 14.0
5
Edgewood-Colesburg

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 14.0

Three Point Percentage

1
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 31.1%
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 30.7%
3
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 30.6%
4
North Linn

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 29.9%
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 24.1%

Free Throws Made Per Game

1
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 12.0
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 11.3
3
North Linn

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 9.8
4
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 9.6
5
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 8.7

Free Throw Attempts Per Game

1
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 19.1
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 17.8
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 16.9
4
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 14.9
5
North Linn

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 14.5

Free Throw Percentage

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 63.7%
2
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 62.9%
3
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 60.2%
4
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 58.1%
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 56.8%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 47.8%
2
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 46.4%
3
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 45.9%
4
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 41.6%
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 40.9%

Offensive Rebounds Per Game

1
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 9.9
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 9.8
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 9.5
4
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 9.0
5
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 8.5

Defensive Rebounds Per Game

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 24.0
2
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 21.0
3
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 19.5
4
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 18.7
5
North Linn

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 15.7
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND