Basketball 2008-09
QuikStatsIowa

Points

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

1372
2
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

1124
3
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

1105
4
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

1100
5
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

1093

Assists

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

296
2
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

277
3
North Linn

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

255
4
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

252
5
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

246

Rebounds

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

811
2
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

700
3
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

658
4
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

600
5
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

533

Steals

1
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

247
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

233
3
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

193
4
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

178
4
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

178

Blocks

1
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

74
2
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

50
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

46
4
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

45
5
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

44

Field Goals Made

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

515
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

414
3
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

406
4
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

400
5
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

393

Field Goal Attempts

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

1218
2
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

1066
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

1034
4
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

1010
5
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

965

Field Goal Percentage

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

42.3%
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

41.0%
3
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

40.7%
4
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

38.1%
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

37.2%

Three Pointers Made

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

134
2
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

109
3
North Linn

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

103
4
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

100
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

76

Three Point Attempts

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

437
2
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

351
3
North Linn

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

344
4
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

327
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

315

Three Point Percentage

1
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

31.1%
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

30.7%
3
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

30.6%
4
North Linn

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

29.9%
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

24.1%

Free Throws Made

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

261
2
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

253
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

221
4
North Linn

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

216
5
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

208

Free Throw Attempts

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

410
2
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

402
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

389
4
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

358
5
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

329

Free Throw Percentage

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

63.7%
2
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

62.9%
3
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

60.2%
4
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

58.1%
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

56.8%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

47.8%
2
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

46.4%
3
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

45.9%
4
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

41.6%
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

40.9%

Offensive Rebounds

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

236
2
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

227
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

218
4
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

190
5
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

187

Defensive Rebounds

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

575
2
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

482
3
Monticello

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

431
4
East Buchanan

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

410
5
Cascade

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

353
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND