| Rk | Athlete | MS |
MP |
SP |
ACE |
SUC |
ATT |
EFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Clinton |
0 | 31 | 92 | 13 | 183 | 198 | 92.4% |
| 2 |
Clinton |
0 | 31 | 91 | 16 | 329 | 339 | 97.1% |
| 2 |
Clinton |
0 | 31 | 91 | 27 | 308 | 321 | 96.0% |
| 4 |
Pleasant Valley |
0 | 33 | 90 | 31 | 234 | 250 | 93.6% |
| 4 |
Pleasant Valley |
0 | 33 | 90 | 7 | 74 | 79 | 93.7% |
| 4 |
Pleasant Valley |
0 | 33 | 90 | 53 | 280 | 324 | 86.4% |
| 7 |
Pleasant Valley |
0 | 32 | 88 | 25 | 314 | 317 | 99.1% |
| 7 |
Pleasant Valley |
0 | 33 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| 7 |
Clinton |
0 | 31 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| 10 |
Bettendorf |
0 | 32 | 85 | 19 | 253 | 258 | 98.1% |
| 10 |
Bettendorf |
0 | 32 | 85 | 14 | 243 | 259 | 93.8% |
| 10 |
Bettendorf |
0 | 32 | 85 | 31 | 223 | 246 | 90.7% |
| 13 |
Bettendorf |
0 | 32 | 84 | 36 | 207 | 232 | 89.2% |
| 13 |
Bettendorf |
0 | 32 | 84 | 2 | 26 | 29 | 89.7% |
| 15 |
Davenport Central |
0 | 14 | 75 | 6 | 66 | 69 | 95.7% |
| 15 |
Davenport Central |
0 | 14 | 75 | 17 | 196 | 203 | 96.6% |
| 17 |
North Scott |
0 | 28 | 72 | 19 | 117 | 135 | 86.7% |
| 17 |
Burlington |
0 | 26 | 72 | 25 | 223 | 234 | 95.3% |
| 17 |
Davenport North |
0 | 15 | 72 | 11 | 191 | 200 | 95.5% |
| 17 |
Davenport North |
0 | 15 | 72 | 25 | 172 | 196 | 87.8% |
| 21 |
Davenport West |
0 | 24 | 71 | 17 | 203 | 218 | 93.1% |
| 22 |
Davenport West |
0 | 24 | 70 | 24 | 169 | 191 | 88.5% |
| 22 |
Davenport West |
0 | 24 | 70 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 100.0% |
| 24 |
Burlington |
0 | 25 | 69 | 19 | 184 | 200 | 92.0% |
| 24 |
Burlington |
0 | 25 | 69 | 42 | 185 | 207 | 89.4% |
| 26 |
Davenport Central |
0 | 13 | 66 | 6 | 75 | 85 | 88.2% |
| 27 |
Davenport Central |
0 | 13 | 65 | 15 | 181 | 194 | 93.3% |
| 27 |
Burlington |
0 | 25 | 65 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 27 |
Burlington |
0 | 24 | 65 | 33 | 206 | 226 | 91.2% |
| 30 |
Assumption |
0 | 2 | 63 | 13 | 151 | 159 | 95.0% |
| 31 |
Muscatine |
0 | 21 | 60 | 13 | 153 | 169 | 90.5% |
| 32 |
Davenport West |
0 | 20 | 56 | 40 | 140 | 178 | 78.7% |
| 33 |
Clinton |
0 | 23 | 54 | 13 | 88 | 98 | 89.8% |
| 34 |
Clinton |
0 | 26 | 53 | 12 | 92 | 96 | 95.8% |
| 35 |
Burlington |
0 | 20 | 49 | 7 | 92 | 107 | 86.0% |
| 36 |
Burlington |
0 | 16 | 45 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 100.0% |
| 37 |
Muscatine |
0 | 17 | 43 | 6 | 24 | 37 | 64.9% |
| 37 |
Muscatine |
0 | 16 | 43 | 3 | 37 | 44 | 84.1% |
| 39 |
Clinton |
0 | 9 | 31 | 1 | 63 | 66 | 95.5% |
| 40 |
Davenport West |
0 | 15 | 30 | 0 | 18 | 21 | 85.7% |
| 41 |
Davenport Central |
0 | 6 | 28 | 0 | 25 | 27 | 92.6% |
| 42 |
Clinton |
0 | 16 | 25 | 2 | 25 | 32 | 78.1% |
| 43 |
Bettendorf |
0 | 14 | 19 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 100.0% |
| 44 |
Bettendorf |
0 | 12 | 13 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 100.0% |
| 45 |
Clinton |
0 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| 46 |
Muscatine |
0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| 46 |
Davenport North |
0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 80.0% |
Volleyball 2010-11
