| Rk | Athlete | MS |
MP |
SP |
ACE |
SUC |
ATT |
EFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Tripoli |
0 | 42 | 105 | 76 | 408 | 447 | 91.3% |
| 2 |
Tripoli |
0 | 42 | 105 | 55 | 412 | 434 | 94.9% |
| 3 |
Tripoli |
0 | 42 | 105 | 58 | 338 | 371 | 91.1% |
| 4 |
Janesville |
0 | 35 | 92 | 40 | 311 | 327 | 95.1% |
| 5 |
Janesville |
0 | 35 | 92 | 102 | 265 | 314 | 84.4% |
| 5 |
Janesville |
0 | 29 | 77 | 41 | 276 | 314 | 87.9% |
| 7 |
Northeast Hamilton |
0 | 22 | 71 | 31 | 296 | 313 | 94.6% |
| 8 |
North Tama |
0 | 30 | 79 | 67 | 285 | 306 | 93.1% |
| 9 |
Dunkerton |
0 | 25 | 68 | 47 | 300 | 305 | 98.4% |
| 10 |
Don Bosco |
0 | 29 | 74 | 33 | 236 | 251 | 94.0% |
| 11 |
Don Bosco |
0 | 26 | 68 | 42 | 220 | 234 | 94.0% |
| 11 |
Northeast Hamilton |
0 | 22 | 71 | 22 | 224 | 234 | 95.7% |
| 13 |
Don Bosco |
0 | 29 | 73 | 28 | 212 | 230 | 92.2% |
| 14 |
Clarksville |
0 | 27 | 70 | 37 | 201 | 225 | 89.3% |
| 15 |
Don Bosco |
0 | 29 | 74 | 24 | 214 | 219 | 97.7% |
| 16 |
Janesville |
0 | 33 | 84 | 17 | 168 | 187 | 89.8% |
| 17 |
Dunkerton |
0 | 25 | 65 | 34 | 158 | 183 | 86.3% |
| 18 |
Northeast Hamilton |
0 | 22 | 71 | 12 | 163 | 178 | 91.6% |
| 19 |
Colo-Nesco |
0 | 17 | 53 | 26 | 158 | 171 | 92.4% |
| 20 |
GMG |
0 | 13 | 43 | 8 | 150 | 151 | 99.3% |
| 21 |
CAL |
0 | 18 | 50 | 27 | 127 | 141 | 90.1% |
| 22 |
North Tama |
0 | 30 | 80 | 21 | 127 | 140 | 90.7% |
| 23 |
CAL |
0 | 18 | 53 | 30 | 123 | 139 | 88.5% |
| 24 |
Clarksville |
0 | 20 | 55 | 14 | 115 | 138 | 83.3% |
| 25 |
GMG |
0 | 13 | 43 | 19 | 92 | 126 | 73.0% |
| 26 |
Dunkerton |
0 | 25 | 68 | 18 | 111 | 121 | 91.7% |
| 27 |
Waterloo Christian |
0 | 19 | 44 | 4 | 99 | 104 | 95.2% |
| 28 |
GMG |
0 | 13 | 41 | 5 | 91 | 102 | 89.2% |
| 29 |
GMG |
0 | 12 | 40 | 5 | 86 | 97 | 88.7% |
| 30 |
Waterloo Christian |
0 | 20 | 50 | 4 | 50 | 63 | 79.4% |
| 31 |
Janesville |
0 | 18 | 26 | 11 | 53 | 56 | 94.6% |
| 32 |
GMG |
0 | 7 | 15 | 6 | 33 | 40 | 82.5% |
| 33 |
GMG |
0 | 13 | 37 | 6 | 21 | 29 | 72.4% |
| 34 |
North Tama |
0 | 3 | 8 | 12 | 26 | 28 | 92.9% |
| 35 |
GMG |
0 | 9 | 21 | 0 | 20 | 26 | 76.9% |
| 36 |
Janesville |
0 | 25 | 66 | 0 | 23 | 20 | 115.0% |
| 37 |
Clarksville |
0 | 27 | 70 | 2 | 18 | 18 | 100.0% |
| 38 |
Janesville |
0 | 35 | 92 | 2 | 17 | 17 | 100.0% |
| 39 |
North Tama |
0 | 13 | 21 | 2 | 12 | 16 | 75.0% |
| 40 |
Colo-Nesco |
0 | 20 | 53 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 85.7% |
| 41 |
Clarksville |
0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 100.0% |
| 41 |
Dunkerton |
0 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 100.0% |
| 43 |
Clarksville |
0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 100.0% |
| 44 |
Colo-Nesco |
0 | 21 | 59 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 44 |
Tripoli |
0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 100.0% |
| 46 |
Tripoli |
0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| 46 |
Dunkerton |
0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 48 |
GMG |
0 | 13 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| 48 |
Tripoli |
0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| 48 |
Northeast Hamilton |
0 | 22 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
Volleyball 2010-11
