Basketball 2021-22
QuikStatsIowa

Points Scored

1
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

99
2
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

93
3
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

81
4
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

77
5
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

66

Points Against

1
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

20
2
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

28
3
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

29
3
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

29
5
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

32

Point Difference

1
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

65
2
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

55
3
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

40
4
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

39
5
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

15

Points

1
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

99
2
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

93
3
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

81
4
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

77
5
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

66

Assists

1
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

28
2
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

27
3
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

24
4
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

20
5
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

15

Rebounds

1
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

51
2
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

46
3
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

37
4
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

34
4
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

34

Steals

1
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

22
1
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

22
3
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

20
4
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

19
5
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

15

Blocks

1
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

8
1
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

8
3
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

6
4
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

5
5
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

4

Field Goals Made

1
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

41
2
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

38
3
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

32
4
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

28
5
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

24

Field Goal Attempts

1
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

75
2
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

73
3
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

72
4
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

64
5
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

59

Field Goal Percentage

1
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

62.9%
2
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

52.9%
3
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

46.7%
4
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

61.3%
5
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

50.9%

Three Pointers Made

1
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

17
2
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

16
3
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

15
4
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

12
5
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

10

Three Point Attempts

1
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

39
2
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

33
2
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

33
2
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

33
5
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

26

Three Point Percentage

1
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

53.8%
2
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

52.6%
3
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

52.0%
4
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

48.4%
5
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

56.2%

Free Throws Made

1
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

17
1
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

17
1
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

17
4
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

16
5
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

15

Free Throw Attempts

1
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

30
2
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

28
3
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

23
3
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

23
5
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

20

Free Throw Percentage

1
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

100.0%
1
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

100.0%
3
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

77.8%
4
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

75.0%
5
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

100.0%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

74.6%
2
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

64.7%
3
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

54.4%
4
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

70.0%
5
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

64.4%

Offensive Rebounds

1
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

21
2
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

19
3
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

18
3
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

18
5
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

16

Defensive Rebounds

1
Aplington-Parkersburg

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

36
2
Dike-New Hartford

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-7

34
3
Denver

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

27
3
Hudson

Class 1A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 1A-7

27
5
Columbus Catholic

Class 2A - North Iowa Cedar-Central - District 2A-8

18
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND