Basketball 2020-21
QuikStatsIowa
Show Filters

Points

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 1102
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 1045
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 996
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 930
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 896

Assists

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 200
2
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 195
3
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 181
4
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 172
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 166

Rebounds

1
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 514
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 491
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 482
4
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 476
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 456

Steals

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 212
2
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

 135
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 126
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 123
5
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 108

Blocks

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 75
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 51
3
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 50
4
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 39
5
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 35

Field Goals Made

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 421
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 400
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 363
4
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 331
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 322

Field Goal Attempts

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 806
2
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 798
3
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 795
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 770
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 746

Field Goal Percentage

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 52.2%
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 50.3%
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 47.1%
4
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 43.2%
5
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 41.5%

Three Pointers Made

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 136
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 94
3
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 80
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 78
5
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 71

Three Point Attempts

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 324
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 295
3
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 268
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

 234
5
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 233

Three Point Percentage

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 42.0%
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 35.1%
3
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 30.0%
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

 29.5%
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 27.1%

Free Throws Made

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 198
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 189
3
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

 174
4
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 172
5
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 151

Free Throw Attempts

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 322
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 283
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 283
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

 272
5
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 266

Free Throw Percentage

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 66.8%
2
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

 64.0%
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 61.5%
4
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 60.8%
5
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 55.6%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 56.6%
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 56.2%
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 52.2%
4
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 50.0%
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 48.5%

Offensive Rebounds

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 171
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 164
3
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 163
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 159
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

 135

Defensive Rebounds

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

 386
2
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 351
3
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 338
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 320
5
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

 312
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND