Basketball 2020-21
QuikStatsIowa

Points

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

218
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

190
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

132
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

117
5
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

108

Assists

1
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

35
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

34
3
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

25
3
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

25
5
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

22

Rebounds

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

101
2
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

61
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

58
4
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

50
5
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

45

Steals

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

29
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

26
3
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

25
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

20
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

18

Blocks

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

23
2
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

9
3
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

8
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

7
5
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

3

Field Goals Made

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

75
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

73
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

51
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

42
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

40

Field Goal Attempts

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

171
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

156
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

121
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

111
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

102

Field Goal Percentage

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

46.8%
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

43.9%
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

42.1%
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

39.2%
5
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

37.8%

Three Pointers Made

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

21
1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

21
3
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

18
4
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

15
5
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

10

Three Point Attempts

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

66
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

62
3
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

45
4
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

37
5
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

36

Three Point Percentage

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

41.7%
2
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

40.0%
3
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

33.9%
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

31.8%
5
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

24.3%

Free Throws Made

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

47
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

27
3
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

25
4
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

23
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

19

Free Throw Attempts

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

70
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

45
3
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

42
4
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

36
5
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

29

Free Throw Percentage

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

67.1%
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

63.9%
3
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

60.0%
4
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

59.5%
5
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

51.7%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

53.5%
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

50.0%
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

48.3%
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

48.0%
5
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

40.1%

Offensive Rebounds

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

28
2
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

21
3
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

17
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

16
5
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

12

Defensive Rebounds

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

73
2
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

44
3
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

38
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

37
5
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

33
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND