Basketball 2020-21
QuikStatsIowa

Points

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

1586
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

1449
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

1309
4
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

1234
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

1214

Assists

1
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

277
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

271
3
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

264
4
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

263
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

248

Rebounds

1
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

784
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

686
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

667
4
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

663
5
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

620

Steals

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

302
2
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

209
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

184
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

183
4
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

183

Blocks

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

110
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

82
3
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

73
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

55
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

48

Field Goals Made

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

603
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

544
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

507
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

433
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

431

Field Goal Attempts

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

1188
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

1135
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

1126
4
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

1072
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

1024

Field Goal Percentage

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

50.8%
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

47.9%
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

45.0%
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

42.3%
5
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

35.2%

Three Pointers Made

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

173
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

145
3
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

114
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

109
5
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

108

Three Point Attempts

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

415
1
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

415
3
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

402
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

344
5
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

327

Three Point Percentage

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

41.7%
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

36.1%
3
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

32.4%
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

31.7%
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

27.5%

Free Throws Made

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

278
2
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

239
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

225
4
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

217
5
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

216

Free Throw Attempts

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

425
2
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

394
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

372
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

367
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

348

Free Throw Percentage

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

65.4%
2
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

65.1%
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

60.5%
4
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

60.3%
5
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

55.1%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

55.1%
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

54.3%
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

49.8%
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

47.6%
5
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

39.0%

Offensive Rebounds

1
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

252
2
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

245
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

236
4
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

225
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

194

Defensive Rebounds

1
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

532
2
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

486
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

450
4
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

438
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

435
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND