Basketball 2020-21
QuikStatsIowa

Points Scored

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

66.1
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

63.0
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

62.3
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

57.8
5
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

56.4

Points Against

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

46.3
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

52.5
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

52.9
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

54.3
5
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

57.2

Point Difference

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

11.8
2
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

9.4
3
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

5.8
4
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

5.1
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

1.6

Points Per Game

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

66.1
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

63.0
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

62.3
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

57.8
5
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

56.1

Assists Per Game

1
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

13.2
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

12.5
3
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

11.8
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

11.3
5
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

11.0

Rebounds Per Game

1
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

32.7
2
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

31.8
3
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

31.6
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

28.6
5
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

28.2

Steals Per Game

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

14.4
2
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

10.0
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

8.7
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

7.7
5
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

7.6

Blocks Per Game

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

4.6
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

3.9
3
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

3.0
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

2.6
5
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

2.6

Field Goals Made Per Game

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

25.1
2
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

24.1
3
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

23.7
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

20.6
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

19.6

Field Goal Attempts Per Game

1
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

53.6
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

49.5
3
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

49.3
4
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

49.0
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

48.8

Field Goal Percentage

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

50.8%
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

47.9%
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

45.0%
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

42.3%
5
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

35.2%

Three Pointers Made Per Game

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

7.9
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

6.3
3
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

5.2
4
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

5.2
5
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

5.1

Three Point Attempts Per Game

1
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

19.2
2
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

18.9
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

18.9
4
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

17.5
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

16.4

Three Point Percentage

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

41.7%
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

36.1%
3
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

32.4%
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

31.7%
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

27.5%

Free Throws Made Per Game

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

11.6
2
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

11.4
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

10.2
4
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

9.5
5
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

9.4

Free Throw Attempts Per Game

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

17.7
2
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

17.5
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

16.9
4
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

16.4
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

15.8

Free Throw Percentage

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

65.4%
2
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

65.1%
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

60.5%
4
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

60.3%
5
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

55.1%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

55.1%
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

54.3%
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

49.8%
4
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

47.6%
5
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

39.0%

Offensive Rebounds Per Game

1
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

11.7
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

10.7
3
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

10.5
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

9.8
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

9.2

Defensive Rebounds Per Game

1
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

22.2
2
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

22.1
3
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

20.9
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

20.1
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

19.8
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND