Basketball 2007-08
QuikStatsIowa

Points

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

1164
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

1025
3
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

975
4
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

933
5
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

630

Assists

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

280
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

214
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

187
4
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

175
5
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

127

Rebounds

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

677
2
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

600
3
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

508
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

486
5
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

349

Steals

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

186
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

184
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

156
4
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

146
5
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

125

Blocks

1
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

98
2
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

46
3
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

40
4
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

38
5
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

28

Field Goals Made

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

422
2
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

379
3
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

378
4
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

361
5
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

231

Field Goal Attempts

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

1051
2
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

924
3
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

916
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

880
5
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

583

Field Goal Percentage

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

41.4%
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

40.2%
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

39.1%
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

43.0%
5
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

39.6%

Three Pointers Made

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

85
1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

85
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

61
4
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

55
5
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

47

Three Point Attempts

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

310
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

287
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

243
4
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

200
5
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

186

Three Point Percentage

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

29.6%
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

27.4%
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

25.1%
4
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

27.5%
5
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

25.3%

Free Throws Made

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

235
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

184
3
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

162
4
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

150
5
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

121

Free Throw Attempts

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

371
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

297
3
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

282
4
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

277
5
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

185

Free Throw Percentage

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

63.3%
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

62.0%
3
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

57.4%
4
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

65.4%
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

54.2%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

44.4%
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

44.2%
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

42.4%
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

47.8%
5
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

43.7%

Offensive Rebounds

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

189
2
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

176
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

163
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

154
5
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

120

Defensive Rebounds

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

488
2
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

437
3
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

332
3
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

332
5
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

229
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND