Basketball 2007-08
QuikStatsIowa
Show Filters

Points

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 77
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 76
3
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 71
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 65
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 61

Assists

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 19
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 16
2
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 16
4
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 15
4
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 15

Rebounds

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 49
2
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 40
3
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 39
4
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 38
5
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 37

Steals

1
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 20
2
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 18
3
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 17
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 16
5
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 15

Blocks

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 11
2
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 10
3
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 7
4
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 6
4
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 6

Field Goals Made

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 33
2
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 30
3
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 29
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 26
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 23

Field Goal Attempts

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 72
1
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 72
3
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 65
4
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 56
5
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 55

Field Goal Percentage

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 55.8%
2
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 49.2%
3
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 47.6%
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 62.5%
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 57.6%

Three Pointers Made

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 9
1
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 9
3
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 7
4
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 6
4
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 6

Three Point Attempts

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 26
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 25
2
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 25
4
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 21
5
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 18

Three Point Percentage

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 75.0%
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 46.2%
3
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 40.0%
4
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 50.0%
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 41.7%

Free Throws Made

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 22
2
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 21
2
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 21
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 17
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 13

Free Throw Attempts

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 33
2
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 32
3
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 30
4
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 23
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 23

Free Throw Percentage

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 100.0%
2
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 85.7%
2
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 85.7%
3
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 89.5%
4
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 75.0%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 61.6%
2
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 54.2%
3
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 51.2%
4
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 71.9%
5
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 57.6%

Offensive Rebounds

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 20
2
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 17
3
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 16
3
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 16
5
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 14

Defensive Rebounds

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 36
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 27
3
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers

 26
3
Alburnett

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 26
3
Springville

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers

 26
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND