Basketball 2007-08
QuikStatsIowa
Show Filters

Points

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 1619
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 1370
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 1140
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 110

Assists

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 372
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 296
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 233
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 16

Rebounds

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 795
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 655
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 639
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 26

Steals

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 249
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 223
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 185
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 11

Blocks

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 83
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 64
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 34
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 4

Field Goals Made

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 615
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 513
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 433
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 34

Field Goal Attempts

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 1411
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 1186
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 1068
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 46

Field Goal Percentage

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 43.6%
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 43.3%
3
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 73.9%
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 40.5%

Three Pointers Made

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 139
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 82
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 62
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 14

Three Point Attempts

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 424
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 275
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 246
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 24

Three Point Percentage

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 32.8%
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 29.8%
3
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 58.3%
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 25.2%

Free Throws Made

1
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 262
2
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 250
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 212
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 28

Free Throw Attempts

1
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 406
2
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 392
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 376
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 35

Free Throw Percentage

1
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 64.5%
2
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 63.8%
3
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 80.0%
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 56.4%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 48.5%
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 46.7%
3
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 89.1%
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 43.4%

Offensive Rebounds

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 344
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 253
3
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 200
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 8

Defensive Rebounds

1
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 455
2
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 451
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 386
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 18
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND