Basketball 2006-07
QuikStatsIowa

Points Scored

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

76
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

64
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

35

Points Against

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

25
2
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

30
3
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

40

Point Difference

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

25
2
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

19
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

5

Points

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

80
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

64
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

35

Assists

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

20
2
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

18
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

9

Rebounds

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

39
2
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

36
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

32

Steals

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

16
2
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

13
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

3

Blocks

1
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

7
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

5
3
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

3

Field Goals Made

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

31
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

25
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

13

Field Goal Attempts

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

62
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

52
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

30

Field Goal Percentage

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

55.4%
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

51.0%
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

43.3%

Three Pointers Made

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

8
1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

8
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

1

Three Point Attempts

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

23
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

19
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

4

Three Point Percentage

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

66.7%
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

55.6%
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

25.0%

Free Throws Made

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

23
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

18
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

8

Free Throw Attempts

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

29
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

27
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

12

Free Throw Percentage

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

88.9%
2
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

84.6%
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

88.9%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

62.5%
2
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

55.6%
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

45.0%

Defensive Rebounds

1
Maquoketa Valley

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

39
2
Starmont

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

36
3
Center Point-Urbana

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Rivers

32
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND