Basketball 2006-07
QuikStatsIowa
Show Filters

Points

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 987
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 624

Assists

1
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 110
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 100

Rebounds

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 589
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 400

Steals

1
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 130
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 100

Blocks

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 124
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 25

Field Goals Made

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 368
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 241

Field Goal Attempts

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 953
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 696

Field Goal Percentage

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 38.6%
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 34.6%

Three Pointers Made

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 63
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 38

Three Point Attempts

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 253
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 155

Three Point Percentage

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 24.9%
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 24.5%

Free Throws Made

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 188
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 104

Free Throw Attempts

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 297
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 172

Free Throw Percentage

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 63.3%
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 60.5%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 41.9%
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 37.4%

Defensive Rebounds

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 589
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 400
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND