Basketball 2006-07
QuikStatsIowa
Show Filters

Points

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 81
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 80

Assists

1
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 16
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 12

Rebounds

1
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 43
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 40

Steals

1
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 19
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 12

Blocks

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 12
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 4

Field Goals Made

1
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 35
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 29

Field Goal Attempts

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 79
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 69

Field Goal Percentage

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 121.7%
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 51.5%

Three Pointers Made

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 10
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 5

Three Point Attempts

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 24
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 20

Three Point Percentage

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 90.9%
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 42.9%

Free Throws Made

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 20
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 16

Free Throw Attempts

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 35
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 24

Free Throw Percentage

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 175.0%
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 80.0%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 143.5%
2
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 52.6%

Defensive Rebounds

1
Alburnett

Class 2A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 43
2
Central City

Class 1A - Tri-Rivers-Valley

 40
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND