Basketball 2006-07
QuikStatsIowa

Points Scored

1
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

68.6
2
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

63.1
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

59.5
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

49.4

Points Against

1
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

44.7
2
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

56.0
3
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

57.0
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

60.6

Point Difference

1
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

18.5
2
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

11.7
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

3.5
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

-11.2

Points Per Game

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

77.4
2
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

68.3
3
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

63.5
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

49.3

Assists Per Game

1
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

15.6
2
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

13.7
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

10.2
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

7.6

Rebounds Per Game

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

34.1
2
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

31.2
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

27.1
4
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

26.4

Steals Per Game

1
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

12.3
2
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

11.0
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

9.9
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

4.5

Blocks Per Game

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

3.6
2
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

2.7
3
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

1.7
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

1.0

Field Goals Made Per Game

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

29.2
2
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

26.0
3
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

22.0
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

18.5

Field Goal Attempts Per Game

1
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

54.3
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

50.5
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

50.2
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

46.7

Field Goal Percentage

1
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

47.9%
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

36.5%
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

58.1%
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

47.1%

Three Pointers Made Per Game

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

7.0
2
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

5.5
3
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

4.3
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

3.0

Three Point Attempts Per Game

1
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

17.2
2
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

14.0
3
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

12.6
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

12.0

Three Point Percentage

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

49.8%
2
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

32.2%
3
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

33.8%
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

25.0%

Free Throws Made Per Game

1
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

14.0
2
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

12.1
3
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

12.0
4
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

9.4

Free Throw Attempts Per Game

1
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

20.5
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

19.0
3
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

17.9
4
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

14.7

Free Throw Percentage

1
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

68.2%
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

49.2%
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

82.4%
4
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

67.2%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

51.8%
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

39.5%
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

65.0%
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

53.0%

Defensive Rebounds Per Game

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

34.1
2
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

31.2
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

27.1
4
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

26.4
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND