Volleyball 2022-23
QuikStatsIowa

Assists Per Set

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

10.1
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

9.8
3
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

9.1
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

8.7
5
Central Lee

Class 3A - SEISC-South

8.2

Kills Per Set

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

11.3
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

10.8
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

10.0
4
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

9.6
5
Central Lee

Class 3A - SEISC-South

8.5

Digs Per Set

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

20.1
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

20.0
3
Central Lee

Class 3A - SEISC-South

17.6
4
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

17.4
5
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

15.0

Blocks Per Set

1
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

2.4
2
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

2.1
3
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

2.1
4
Central Lee

Class 3A - SEISC-South

1.9
5
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

1.6

Serve Aces Per Set

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

2.5
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

2.3
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

2.2
4
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

2.1
5
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

2.1

Kill Attempts Per Set

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

35.1
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

33.3
3
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

31.9
4
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

29.2
5
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South

27.7

Kill Efficiency

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

.265
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

.226
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

.224
4
Central Lee

Class 3A - SEISC-South

.217
5
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

.201

Serve Successes Per Set

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

20.4
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

19.7
3
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

18.7
4
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

17.4
5
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

17.1

Serve Attempts Per Set

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

21.2
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

21.0
3
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

20.0
4
Mediapolis

Class 2A - SEISC-South

19.1
5
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South

18.9

Serve Efficiency

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South

96.4%
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

93.8%
3
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South

93.4%
4
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

92.9%
5
Central Lee

Class 3A - SEISC-South

91.5%
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND